ChatGPT Compliance Review
Polished writing can create a false sense of reliability. A draft that looks ready is more likely to be published without verification, which makes factual review especially important.
#Separate two kinds of risk
#Factual risks
- Inaccurate data.
- Outdated dates or information.
- Presenting an inference as a fact.
- Unclear sources.
#Compliance risks
- Copyright infringement.
- Imitating a brand or author too closely.
- Misleading promises.
- Sensitive descriptions unsuitable for public distribution.
#What needs human verification?
Review specific numbers, years and percentages; explanations of laws, policies and platform rules; brand, health, income or employment claims; competitor comparisons, testimonials and rankings; and copy that could directly affect a decision.
A useful test is: could a reader make a decision based on this sentence? If so, verify it.
#A practical workflow
- Generate a draft with ChatGPT.
- Ask it to list claims that need checking.
- Have a person verify the important facts.
- Refine the wording with ChatGPT.
- Retain version history and source notes before publication.
The model helps with drafting speed; a person remains responsible for the review.
